Can you check if everything makes sense:
The writer uses the technique of emotive language. For instance, the author directly links “killing young people” to the policies of the former government. This appeals to the audience’s sense of sympathy and causes them to feel more responsible of supporting young people to stop them from dying. Furthermore, the author asserts that the current government “aggressively pursued” these dangerous drug policies. This paints the other governments as aggressive and uncompassionate in comparison to the greens party which is portrayed as the only caring party. Thirdly, instead of referring to drug users as “junkies”, they are described as “vulnerable people” by the writer. This positively portrays drug addicts as people that are weak and in need for protection rather than violent people as opposes to stereotypes.

Question

Can you check if everything makes sense:
The writer uses the technique of emotive language. For instance, the author directly links “killing young people” to the policies of the former government. This appeals to the audience’s sense of sympathy and causes them to feel more responsible of supporting young people to stop them from dying. Furthermore, the author asserts that the current government “aggressively pursued” these dangerous drug policies. This paints the other governments as aggressive and uncompassionate in comparison to the greens party which is portrayed as the only caring party. Thirdly, instead of referring to drug users as “junkies”, they are described as “vulnerable people” by the writer. This positively portrays drug addicts as people that are weak and in need for protection rather than violent people as opposes to stereotypes.

ladybug · Answer

The writer uses the technique of emotive language. 
For instance, the author directly links “killing young people” to the policies of the former government. 
This appeals to the audience’s sense of sympathy which causes them to feel responsible for protecting young people from dying. 
Furthermore, the author asserts that the current administration (presidential administration) “aggressively pursued” these dangerous drug policies. 
This paints the other administrations as aggressive and uncaring in comparison to the Green Party which is portrayed as the only compassionate party. Thirdly, instead of referring to drug users as “junkies”, they are described as “vulnerable people” by the writer. 
This positively portrays drug addicts as people that are weak and in need of protection rather than violent people, as opposed to stereotypes

Ask native speakers questions for free