¿Esto suena natural? I think mandatory retirement system should be kept as a criterion for judgement of retirement and instead we should add a reemployment system like many companies set it up recently. I have two reasons for this opinion.
First, if we abolish a mandatory retirement system, it’s difficult to fire a employee who doesn’t have a enough capabilities and talent for their jobs. Instead we should reemploy a person who have a enough capabilities and talent even though their ages.
Second, we Japanese tend to obey the older people’s opinion. For example, you know the politician “NIkai” he is eighty two years old. Many politicians obey his opinion. If the older employees keep to own their power in their company, those companies will lose their vitality.

I think the mandatory retirement system should be kept as a criterion for judgement of retirement, and instead we should addimplement a reemploymentre-employment system like many companies sethave itrecently up recentlyinstituted.

First, if we abolish a mandatory retirement system, it’s difficult to fire a employee who doesn’t havepossess asufficient enough capabilities and talent for their jobs.

Instead we should reemployrehire a person who havehas athe enoughrequired capabilities and talent evendespite though their agesage.

Second, we Japanese tend to obey theand respect older people’s opinionopinions.

For example, you know the politician “NIkai””, he is eighty two years old.

If the older employees keep to ownthemselves their power in their companyrespective companies, those companies will lose their vitality.