Search results for Kyoto

There is not much difference, but "get to" seems to stress the arrival part or the transportation part more.... is what I feel^^'

There are about the same. Walk around is more common. Let’s walk around Kyoto. Let’s take a st...

"Is it Kyoto?" sounds like "Are you talking about Kyoto?" And "Is that Kyoto?" sounds like you are asking about something someone showed you, or something you saw. For example, if someone shows y...

I never heard someone say "a bus for (place)". Usually when we say a bus going somewhere with stops along the way, we say "(place) bound bus".

They mean about the same. but the first one puts more emphasis on the getting there (the journey). The second one puts more emphasis on being in Kyoto.

More accurate would be "picture of Kyoto Catalogue" vs "Kyoto Catalogue picture". They both have the same meaning, but "picture of Kyoto Catalogue" is used in more cases.

They mean the same thing since "lived," is past tense meaning that you no longer live there

One is how the person enjoys it (how do YOU like Kyoto). The other is how it IS. i.e. How do you like Denver? --> I like it so-so, it has great activities if you know where to go. How IS Denver?...

The first two sentences mean exactly the same thing and invoke the same feelings. The third sentence is incomplete and incorrect.

There is no difference. The word "like" can be used with both "to [verb]" and "[verb]ing"